Revolution & Complacency
If I were blogging back in 2000, readers would have been bombarded with the usual, predictable incessant tirades concerning the ‘evils’ of capitalism, corporate abuses, the looting of our treasury, and the widening gap between wealth and everyone else. You would have perhaps dismissed my rambling discourses as the rantings of a disillusioned Trotskyite caught up in the idealistic Marxist fervor over class warfare, robber barons, and social inequity. You would have thought me a ‘conspiracy theorist’ and left-wing whack-job. You might have considered my words and those of others like me, and then, after a moment, returned to your Wall Street Journal editorial page, checked your stock portfolio, and went right back to life, unwilling to accept the possibility that anyone or any group of people could be so laden with Greed as to endanger the entire nation for the sake of profit.
Some of us believed that an administration with business experience would be good for the country. We imagine business-minded people to be the types who roll up their sleeves to tackle the big issues head-on while beads of sweat run off their foreheads. We dreamed about practical-minded and sound fiscal ideals, much the same sort we apply when balancing a checkbook, repairing a leaky faucet, or saving for that rainy day. We were fooled. Twice. The enemies that this administration portrays as enemies might very well be enemies, and while we are focused on those enemies, another enemy, more insidious and deceptive, plies his trade under waving flags, between the pages of Scripture, and from beneath the coffins of our dead brothers and sisters. This enemy has our tacit approval.
It is long past the time for moral outrage. I am steaming mad at them. They, however, are not the focus of my primary concern, at least for the moment. I look at all that is going on and I want to cry because I realize that which we allow may ultimately be what we become. I fear of getting comfortable with things as they are and then making excuses for the status quo, enabling these pin-striped Vikings to continue their raiding and pillaging of the planet while sitting in my armchair and trying not to spill Starbuck’s coffee on the day’s Wall Street Journal.
Trotsky spoke of a ‘perpetual revolution’. Revolution is not always about political or social upheaval. It also relates to vigilance and perseverance on a personal level, an inner mechanism to shield us from the complacency that mutates a people into the very thing we rebelled against from the first. It is not only for balance of power in governance we advance, but a struggle for the conscience of humanity, collectively and individually.
I do not want my own conscience sullied by justifications for what the corporatists do. There may come a brief second when I contemplate some rationale for their crimes. Descartes said “I think; therefore I am.” Though I may disagree with his statement (I prefer Spinoza’s “I am, therefore I think.”), it does seem to apply in this context. If I begin to think as they do, there is a good chance I have already become like them. Hannah Arendt once said, “The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.” I fear she is correct and that, at least in me, is an unacceptable outcome.
“No real social change has ever been brought about without a revolution. Revolution is but thought carried into action.” (Emma Goldman, 1869-1940)
6 Comments:
Americans need to dig their heads out of the sand. And the pharmaceutical company manufacturing "complacency pills" would certainly be really *rolling in it* by now! (I imagine they would try to dispense them first to the STAFF at the hospital where I work ;) Healthcare, politics and sass in one post; I'm liking this...
hmmm...koftu: people who disagree with my view (?) Actually what I made was an all-inclusive statement: Americans in general. I would be included in that population. But if our heads are in the clouds, so be it. I'd rather be where I can get a better view! ;-)
Kotfu,
Good to see you again!
An extremist is someone ALWAYS who takes something to it's logical or necessary conclusion.
It is called 'extremism' because most people want to be complacent and comfortable where they are, no matter how bad the current situation may be. It reminds me of stories from the Holocaust where Jews caught in camps refused to rebel because they thought it would make the Germans mad. You mean things could have actually gotten worse?
Primo Levi once wrote that we must always fight against unearned privilege, but we must understand that it is a fight which never ends.
Primo Levi's essay "The Grey Zone" inspired a 2001 film about the "Sonderkommando" resistance at Birkenau.
Wouldn't that be considered a direct revolt?
Kotfu,
I had intended to write an entire post of 'extremism' but what the hey?
Extremism occurs because people buy into ideas and the pun is intended. It starts as marketing or advertising. No one gets up and says " I have a pretty good product to sell" or " My religion is kinda sorta true." They always claim thier product is the 'best'. It starts as absolutes from someone who is trying to sell you something, be it a product or idea.
Extremism is placing your idea so far above those of others that when other voice their opinions you react violently or seek to shut down their dissent. (Jimmy Carter used a similar definition for fundamentalism.)
Sometimes a good idea IS a good idea based upon some standard. To simply call someone extreme or psycho depends on what you're talking about.
Kol Tuv
If I may ask..WHO has gone truly psycho?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home