Undermining the Free Market
“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . Corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money-power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed.” (Abraham Lincoln)
The current lobbying debacle going on in the Capitol would make excellent fiction if it weren’t so terribly true. Here we have a giant house of political, interpersonal cards being not ever-so-gently toppled by the jilted ex-lover of one of the major players. “Hell”, indeed, “hath no fury as a woman scorned.” If I were to offer advice to anyone on
Everyone realizes that
To be fair, one can fully expect to find this sort of criminality under any loosely policed political structure. The
Contrary to what many Republicans promote as reality, most Democrats in the
The Abramoff problem is one that should have most supporters of the free market very, very upset. I would expect to find true conservatives to be generally outraged by the scandal. Influence peddling offers an unfair advantage to one company over another. It means that the consumer in many cases doesn’t get a real choice of product, and that this product or service is contracted without the consent of the consumer at all. Lobbyists undermine the very things that proponents of free market economics cite as reasons to allow free markets. Ingenuity is no longer a matter of making a better, safer, or necessary product; all of that mental effort focuses on the means by which it can be sold through payoffs to elected officials. Those voices among conservatives, if there are any remaining, keep silent because of political allegiances.
Under the present system, we no longer have a world where product A competing honestly against product B for the consumer dollars. When product A is able to influence politician X to write laws that would, in effect, restrict market access for product B, then the system is no longer a market, nor is it free. The makers of product A have every right to advertise to consumers. They should not however be able to enact law on their own behalf, or law that benefits their own specific interest through bribery. I see little difference between
Capitalists, Anarchists, Theocrats, and Socialists alike should be outraged by this, and too few seem to really care. Where has honesty gone? The barbarians are not merely at the gates; they hold the mortgage.
“Corruption? Corruption is our protection! Corruption keeps us safe and warm! Corruption is why you and I are prancing around in here instead of fighting over scraps of meat out in the streets! Corruption... is why we win!” (From the movie Syriana, 2005)
“Principles, Sir, are becoming corrupt, deeply corrupt; & unless the progress of corruption, & perversion of truth can be arrested, neither liberty nor property, will long be secure in this country. And a great evil is, that men of the first distinction seem, to a great extent, to be ignorant of the real, original causes of our public distresses.” (Noah Webster, 1837)
1 Comments:
Anon,
The drug lobbyists in DC outnumber our elected representatives by about 50%. They spend billions of dollars pushing their agenda through Congress.
Lets not forget their control over the FDA and their efforts to shut down competing industries such as herbal supplements and their opposition to the legalization of marijuana. We also have the drug companies controlling the prices by buying off our politicians to prevent our government from collectively bargaining lower prescription prices like they do in Canada.
The recent Medicare changes also benefitted the drug companies by increasing what the government would pay for certain drugs, while taking other benefits away from seniors.
Lets face the hard truth here. The bills that go through Congress usually have money involved and where there is money, there is someone who wants it, and that someone buys his way in and writes the legislation in such a way to benefit his own interest.
Can you say Halliburton? Exxon Mobil? Phizer? How about the sudden turn around on the asbestos problem?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home