March 27, 2005

Simple Arithmetic


The most insidious of all the lies foisted by the corporateers upon Americans, and the one that must be the first to fall is the notion that American goods, produced by American workers, will not be affordable to American consumers. That devious message has been predominant in the minds of so many; many who readily admit that this nation spent its first 250 years leading the planet in productivity and standard of living through building, buying, and bartering in American goods amongst American consumers. FUBU!

In the 1930's there were over 2,000,000 registered Socialists in the U.S. Trotsky, who was extensively world-traveled, said that the American worker was the greatest worker on the planet. It was true then and it remains equally true today. Unfortunately, the divide and conquer propaganda of the internationalists has taken root, and the American consumer, driven by consumerism, considers the American worker, his neighbor and brother, to be his economic enemy. This sort of consumer does not realize that "you get what you pay for." Sometimes one even gets a whole lot more than was paid for, in terms of the detrimental effects of unbalanced trade and local unemployment.

If we don’t support our local workers and the companies they work for, then we are all but asking them to pack up and disappear. The erosion of our manufacturing base has evident and tragic consequences. Unemployment and urban blight are only two of the problems. The largest, most striking, most costly, and most ignored is the destruction of the of the local, state, and federal tax base. If a corporation moves to another labor market, the property taxes, the equalizations taxes, the usage taxes, the unemployment taxes, and the payroll taxes from the now-out-of-work employees are no longer collected. This means that schools, roads, police, fire, community health, sanitation, and whole host of other necessary municipal functions must now scramble for funds to operate. Since the amount of money needed never seems to decrease, where does one imagine these operations will find the money? They will do as they have been doing; raising the taxes of everyone else.

We have to get the consumer behind us. Like it or not, that consumer will decide our economic fate, sometimes at the cash register and sometimes in the ballot booth. The beginning of change begins with shattering the facade of corporate benevolence, and showing what the real costs of the current economic and financial policies hold for every American. Once again, it all comes down to simple arithmetic. Please connect the dots and do the math.

The current administration promotes three basic fundamental ideas that underlay their economic policies. These are what I call the three ‘goods’ of Republican economics and the algorithm by which they calculate their own special form of cost-benefit analysis.

1) Unemployment is good. Next time your job is ‘downsized’ or your company moves to Malaysia and some tells you to ‘get a job’, remind him that you are helping the economy by not working! A flooded market lowers wages, and lower wages are good for who again?

2) Outsourcing is good. Sending jobs overseas to be done at a fraction of the cost, no matter how bad the quality is a great thing! Even if these companies still charge the American consumer the same amount for the product. Where exactly does the consumer benefit from this? Oh wait. He doesn’t. Strict adherence to rule #2 also ensures that rule #1 will reach its maximum success.

3) Debt is good. Spending more money than you make is always a good idea to the Republicans, and every household in America is missing out on this clever economic strategy! Why didn’t I think of it? Rule #3 is the inescapable outcome of applying rules #1 and #2, since everyone will end up having to borrow money for their basic needs, and at that point, debt will become a mark of slavery and indentured servitude. Remember the days of 'owing your soul to the company store' ?

Ask yourself, who do these ideas really benefit? Simple arithmetic reveals the truth about these misguided notions.

Above all, we must promote a generational mind-change about how we view wealth, money, and finances. There is already a healthy amount of skepticism regarding economic policy and corporate practices. Most people know it stinks. The key in this matter is to show the long term effects of wrong-minded and self-destructive policies, and most importantly, to shake Americans out of their disengagement and apathy. It will not happen overnight. If we don't change the core of how Americans view 'subsistence', then even if we save one or two generations, the third and fourth will, once again fall prey to the purveyors of economic snake-oil and avarice. If we are going to make changes, let's at least make them stick.

Ultimately, we need legislation that balances the power between worker and owner, just as one seeks balance between the branches of government. In the state of Michigan, former governor and still fat-bastard Engler (R) and the Republican dominated state Senate spent 12 years breaking union power through secret midnight voting sessions and the refusal to allow state labor committees to arbitrate disputes in good faith. Had strong and unambiguous legislation existed, labor would have had some recourse in the courts. It is true that everything changes, but at least we would have a clear legal standard to help us adjust to those changes without being thoroughly shafted in the meanwhile.

Changing minds is crucial, but also requires the backing provided by the practical power of legislation to make it stick. Please, let us stand up for ourselves for a change. We can make this happen in so many ways.

“Every economic system, whether Capitalist or Socialist, denigrates into a system of privilege and exploitation unless it is policed by a social morality, which can only reside in a minority of citizens……Freedom is always in danger, and the majority of mankind will always acquiesce in its loss, unless a minority is willing to challenge the privilege of the few and the apathy of the masses.” (R.H.S. Crossman, from The New Fabian Essays, 1972)

In The News: Another Republican Revealed

This tidbit comes by way of HARD ATTACK NEWS. Once again, the political faction hell-bent on morality, the Bible, and destroying evil in the service of God and country finds one of its own being “hoisted by his own petard.” From the thrice divorced and drug addicted Rush Limbaugh, the sexually harassing Bill O’Reilly, right down to the high-stakes gambling moral crusader Bill Bennett, the ranks of the fascist republicans are filled with liars and two-faced jackasses, unable to control their own compulsions, yet willing to enact laws and promote ‘wars’ on everyone else. Talk about projection! These are dangerous people.

Here is another little piece of news that usually ends up going unnoticed. I will break it up and add my comments as we go along. Sometimes you have to really get a grip on what's being said.

GOP Advisor Dies Of Overdose

By Stephanie Mansfield
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Republican media adviser R. Gregory Stevens, who was found dead in the Beverly Hills, Calif., home of actress Carrie Fisher on Feb. 26, died of an overdose of cocaine and the painkiller OxyContin, according to the Los Angeles County coroner's office.

(At least two felonies committed here. He deliberately sought out and purchased cocaine and, if he didn’t have a prescription, the OxyContin would also be illegal. Conspiracy to purchase and transport would also be added to the charges were he caught, assuming that he’d ever be prosecuted anyhow.)

A spokeswoman at the coroner's office read to The Washington Times portions of the report, which was completed Friday. "Cocaine and OxyContin," the spokeswoman said when asked by phone what was the cause of death. When asked specifically whether there was a drug overdose, she said "yes." Another part of the autopsy revealed that Mr. Stevens also suffered from hypertrophic heart disease. However, the spokeswoman said this was not a factor in his death.

(That spokeswoman will be fired and sent to Gitmo by Rumsfeld. Just watch.)

Mr. Stevens, 42, was an associate with the powerhouse Washington lobbying firm Barbour Griffith & Rogers and had traveled to Los Angeles to attend the Academy Awards.

(Do we remember Haley Barbour of the GOP? Same guy. This lobbying firm is a fascist group. Read about their goals on their website. Scary shit. These guys aren' t the solution. They're the problem!)

Mr. Stevens was staying at the home of Miss Fisher. The two were longtime friends. Both attended a star-studded party at the home of film industry agent Bryan Lourd Miss Fisher's former husband -- the night before his death. Miss Fisher found Mr. Stevens' body in a guest room the following morning. But on the previous night, the actress said when news of the death broke, Mr. Stevens "was in good shape."

"Tons and tons of people saw him. He was Greg," she said.

(I had thought Carrie Fisher had beaten her own drug habit years ago, but, as one can tell from that comment, it’s quite probable that she has relapsed.)

"People want to find a scandal in it, but there is none. I don't get it. Nobody does," Miss Fisher said.

(No Scandal? I know that in Ms. Fisher’s world, drug overdose is a daily occurrence, and it’s true, when a poor unemployed black man smokes crack to escape the brutality of his life, it’s a horrible thing in the eyes of the super-moral GOP fascists and their crusade to stop the poor from doing drugs, but when one of their rich darlings overdoses himself, it isn’t important enough to mention? Why is it that those who insist on harsh penalties for the rules that they make, don't wish to hold themselves accountable to the same standard?)

Mr. Lourd had no comment when reached by The Washington Times.

(Of course not. He probably gave him the cocaine.)

Mr. Stevens, with strong ties to the Hollywood entertainment community, served as the head of the Bush-Cheney Entertainment Task Force for President Bush's recent inaugural. Barbour Griffith & Rogers, one of the co-founders of which was chairman of the Republican National Committee, held a memorial service for Mr. Stevens earlier this month.

(Why is it that every new government department that GW creates has a name that sounds childishly fascist? “Entertainment Task Force”? Do they wear fatigues? Or just the Nazi arm bands?)

March 25, 2005

A Change of Habit

Recently, I did something that I thought I’d never, ever do. The aging process sometimes comes with a little bit of wisdom, or at least a greater degree of self-awareness as the passions die a little more with each passing day. As Ernest Hemingway said “ Old men are not wise, just more cautious”, and perhaps that sense of cautiousness has led me to reassess some of my lifestyle choices.

I have always had three basic components to my day ever since I was 17. These are what I call the three ‘browns”; coffee, chocolate, and pipe tobacco. There were stretches of time where I did without one or the other, not out of desire to quit, but simply out of a short-term lack of desire. I have never deliberately made any attempt to quit any of the three. I’m a person who works out and enjoys vices in moderation, and felt that whatever side-effects these substances might produce would be outweighed by the usual regimen of physical labor, exercise, and nutritional supplements. I was wrong.

It not that these substances, when used in moderation, cause huge problems their own. Moderate use is safe and in some cases recommended. The problem for me is that these ‘browns’ tend to exacerbate existing bumps, scrapes, and strains incurred throughout my life. I noticed that within two days of not drinking coffee, that my knees, elbows, hands, and hips, normally wracked by intense pain from abuse in the gym and at work, stopped hurting altogether. I mean it. I felt like a new person, and was able to start training again with more energy and vigor than I’ve seen in couple of years. I was also, for the longest time, having appendicitis-like symptoms, and at time they were quite painful. Within days of stopping my caffeine intake, the pains disappeared and have not returned. I am also sleeping much deeper than I have in years, and the old pattern vivid and lucid dreaming has returned full force. Now, if I could only get the cats on my sleep schedule, all would be perfect.

I don’t get sick much, but when I do, it’s serious. I try not to be a cry-baby. Caffeine is a stimulant, not a nutrient, and it causes more urinary function than normal, which puts and added strain on your system when trying to recover from flu or cold. Caffeine also washes nutrients out of your body, so if you are taking vitamins, herbal supplements, or medications, the level of help you receive from these health aids are greatly diminished. It was such a sudden and powerful flu at prompted me not only to limit my caffeine intake for the duration of the illness, but to cease using it altogether. I was a good decision.

I am not going to get into the science of caffeine or cocoa, or their effects on the body. There are 100s of websites dedicated to that. My purpose is to express the importance of reviewing some of the every-day habits we have as far as nutrition is concerned. When we are young, nothing appears to effect us, and as we age, everything seems to try and kill us. The coffee and tea are now ‘verboten.’ I have already stopped eating deep fried foods and have cut back on my salt intake. I have seen real improvement even though I wasn’t chronically ill, maybe I just didn’t know I was about to be. A cost/benefit analysis never hurts, no matter what one discovers in the process.

If I ever have to give up my beer, however, I may have to kill myself.

March 24, 2005

For Yoeli (An Open Letter)


"The Lonely Explorer"

This letter is came about as a result of a series of fictional (or not so fictional) tales of the times and trials of ‘Yoel’ (or Joel as he likes to be called now), a Chasidic man who seeks to escape his roots and is experiencing ‘golus’(exile) from the familiar for the first time. The stories, written and posted by Reb Shtreimel, are a gritty, realistic, and thought evoking accounts of the challenges that face many people in and out of the Orthodox world. Many thanks to Reb Shtreimel and many others whose comments on this subject helped me to put into words what has been rattling around in my head for so long.

Dear Yoeli,

Ok. So you've decided to frei out. You've had enough of whatever it is about your life as a frumme yid that you can't stand a moment longer being part of the kehilla. So what's next? That unanswerable question of ‘what's next’ is biggest problem you’re going to face. You won’t even know what to plan for, let alone how to react to it when it happens. Talk about being ‘tinuk shenishba’! You know there is a golus, and you know what goes on in golus, you’ve been commuting to work and yeshiva every day through golus, but as far as actively emigrating and integrating into golus, you have to become a little bit of the golus itself, and that, my friend, holds more surprises than first-time parenting.

Ok. You’re a Jew and you’re probably a smart guy. Lots of Jews already in Golus doing ok for themselves. Yet, you forget that most of them were born there. It’s different being a wide-eyed immigrant where you imagine the streets are paved with pritzus, intellectual freedom, and brutal honesty. I can promise you that is not the case. There are as many closed minded backward Neanderthals in golus as there are in New Square, and just as many people to tell you one thing and mean another. Admittedly, your chances of getting laid are better out here, but sooner or later that holds no personal rewards either.

It’s easy for a ba’al teshuva coming to Yiddishkeit. If he is confused about how to behave all he has to do is pick up a Kitzur Shulchan Aruch, call his Chabad Rabbi, or visit a halachically approved website for instruction. What sort of operations manual does one get when entering golus? Answer? There is none. You have to rely on yourself, and you will have no idea what to expect, even if you’ve encountered it in your former charedi style. You will be on the other side of the counter now, trying to hawk the same old wares with a different marketing style. Though it can be fun, it won’t be easy if your attitude isn’t readjusted for golus mentality. That takes time.

I am open about some of the issues that I dealt with in my new-found freedom. These were not petty little annoyances, even if they are sometimes funny stories or told in an entertaining fashion. There was a lot of pain involved in living those times, and the conflicting emotions still prevail. I might be good at being a sheygitz now, but so what? It just means that I’ve become intimate with 100s of behaviors that I might be better off not living around. Sometimes, the more of a sheygitz I try to be, the more of the Jew I become. You move to golus and thoughts of home will always haunt you, because golus has no purpose, no unity, and no continuity. Those happen to be the things I LIKE about golus, but for many, this just drives the discontent further down into the psyche. You are used to having meaning to your life and it’s easier to quit heroin than it is to stop searching for meaning. I mean that.

There is a saying that goes “Wherever you go, there you are.” Whatever it is that bothers you right now, might follow you into golus, if you don’t recognize it and get rid of it beforehand. The same problems that create issues for you on the inside will create the same problems on the outside, except that on the outside, those problems remain personal and not institutional. I am still very much the same man I was when I went to the mikveh every morning, davened a long shmoneh esrey, and stayed up late at the kollel. My behavior has changed, but my personality has not. If you are unhappy there, golus can offer you nothing but unbounded escapes and distractions from your personal unhappiness, and even if your complaints against the kehilla are justified (most are), personally there will be no advantage for you to leave. Having fun is not a cure for unhappiness. Do not be fooled by appearances, there is as much suffering and pain out here as anywhere else, probably more.

Someday, long after you have shed every last vestige of who you think you didn’t want to be, you will secretly, or maybe not so secretly, once again yearn for the touch of the person who understands that part of you. It is not likely you will ever find that person in the places you are thinking of moving to. Ultimately, you have to decide that whatever you are going to live without for now, will be something that you’ll have to surrender forever.

Are you prepared for that?

Sincerely,

One Who Knows From Experience

If you know someone who is contemplating becoming like Yoeli, send him/her a copy of this letter, give him/her a non-judgmental shoulder to lean on, and listen compassionately.

Amalek: Final Solution or Endless Problem?

זכור, את אשר-עשה לך עמלק, בדרך, בצאתכם ממצרים. אשר קרך בדרך, ויזנב בך כל-הנחשלים אחריך--ואתה, עיף ויגע; ולא ירא, אלהים. והיה בהניח יהוה אלהיך לך מכל-איביך מסביב, בארץ אשר יהוה-אלהיך נתן לך נחלה לרשתה--תמחה את-זכר עמלק, מתחת השמים; לא, תשכח.

Devarim 25:17-19

“Remember What Amalek did to you on the road while leaving Egypt. How he attacked you in cold-blood on that road, and cut down those who straggled behind, while you were exhausted and fatigued. And when God finally relieves us of the enemies around us, in the land which He gives you as an inheritance; you must erase the memory of the people Amalek from humanity; Never forget this.”

The RamBam in Hilchos Melochim U’Milchomos 1:5 comments:

וכן מצות עשה לאבד זרע עמלק, שנאמר "תמחה את זכר עמלק" (דברים כה,יט); ומצות עשה לזכור תמיד מעשיו הרעים ואריבתו, כדי לעורר איבתו--שנאמר "זכור, את אשר עשה לך עמלק" (דברים כה,יז). מפי השמועה למדו, "זכור" בפה; "לא, תשכח" (דברים כה,יט) בלב, שאסור לשכוח איבתו ושנאתו.

“It is an active mitzvah to destroy the seed of Amalek…..and to constantly remind oneself of his treachery, and to arouse within oneself a bitter hatred in one’s heart.”

Notice what the Torah is saying here; that even when we are finally at peace in our homes and at peace with our other neighbors, even 1000s of years later, it remains a mitzvah to eradicate the people, possessions, artifacts, books, and history of Amalek from human memory. Not a trace of their existence is to remain for posterity. I need not remind anyone of the 20th century parallel to this ‘mitzvah’.

What strikes me as odd is why Amalek catches so much flack over his attacking the Jews when several nations did so as well, but there was no mitzvah to eradicate them, only to subdue or defeat them in battle, as part of the normal conquest or self-defense of the Israel. Amalek, however, is even a peace-time enemy! Maybe it’s always important to have something to fear and hate? Let’s look at the Israelites short history with the Amalekites so far to find out why Moshe hated them so much. It seem they were akin to the first ‘terrorists’, or so the Torah would like you to believe.

Dev. 25:18 says “attacked you in cold blood, and cut down those who straggled behind”. This attack occurred in Refidim (Shemos 17) when the Jews, headed toward Har Sinai, were attacked by the Amalekites, who came many miles out of their way to attack the Jews who had fallen behind the larger and better protected caravan. The assumption is that Amalek had no reason to attack the Jews, since his nation was not under direct threat by the Israelite invasion. This assumption brings up some troubling questions.

1) The Medrash tells us that the entire world knew of Yitzias Mitzrayim and knew that the Jews were coming to claim their homeland. It is not unreasonable, even without a Medrash, that traders and others fleeing Egypt would have spread the word of the Israelite rebellion, the plagues, and the Jews desire to emigrate northward. So, even if the Jews current destination was not toward Israel, since Har Sinai was a detour to the southeast, the Amalekites KNEW that eventually this newly established and well armed nation was going to be coming their way in a short time. The Amalekites were conducting a preemptive strike on an immanent threat. See any parallels in current times?

2) Who doesn’t attack in cold blood? Especially in those days, long before human rights legislation and Geneva Conventions were ever conceived. No man can conduct a war with empathic or sympathetic feelings toward the enemy. Why should Amalek have been held to higher standard than anyone else? Why does our brutal conquest not come under the same scrutiny?

3) Moshe was mad because the Amalekites did not mount a full frontal assault on the Jews. The Torah claims that there were approximately 600,000 men of fighting age and ability among those who left Mitzrayim, which is much more than the Amalekites, a nomadic people, could have ever mustered, even if they mustered every man woman and child for battle. It seems to me that the Amalekites conducted the same military strategy that every army would use when vastly outnumbered by an enemy; one never attacks a strong position or gives up the element of surprise when attacking a much larger and powerful foe. Secondly, for the Amalelites to have attacked the main body of Jews, they would have had to delay their attack for several days, if not weeks, and thereby lose time and perhaps also the element of surprise.

4) Why did Moshe leave the ‘necheshalim’ unguarded? Moshe grew up as a prince in Pharoah’s house and must have known something about military tactics and planning, since that sort of training is part and parcel of being among the royal household. Is Moshe now trying cover up his own tactical errors by shifting blame to the Amalekites? What caused Moshe to allow people to fall so far behind anyway, knowing that they would be vulnerable to attack? And why wasn’t HaShem protecting these poor souls who fell behind?

5) The question of ‘necheshalim’ and the attack becomes a bit stronger when you consider the structure and shape of the Israelite caravan. Whether one believes that is was a system of Napoleonic Squares or an elongated rectangular formation, the Tribe of Dan was called in the Torah “measeph mikol hamachanos” (the gatherer or rear guard of all the encampments.) It was the responsibility of the sheyvet Dan to make sure that stragglers and their possessions would not be left behind and were well guarded. So even if there were ‘nechshalim’ they were, at least according to the Torah account, guarded to some extent by the warriors of Dan. So why the outrage?

6) Moshe claimed that the Jews were “tired and weary” when the Amalekites attacked them, yet when one looks at the Torah, the Jew already had the Manna, the quails, they had plenty of water, and at least a weeks rest before arriving at Refidim. Even if many of the women, children, and elderly were weakened from desert travel, the warriors, who Yehoshua easily called to arms, seem to have handled the initial attack with great success. Maybe the Amalekite warriors were tired, too?

7) The word ‘necheshalim’ means to venture out. Don’t the people themselves bear some responsibility for leaving the safety of the caravan? One has to wonder where exactly it was they would be ‘venturing out’ to do in the middle of a desert, especially when all their needs were met by the encampment and HaShem. It is probable that these ‘nechashalim’ were people who thought they could do some commerce with the local Bedouin tribes, and were cut down upon leaving the camp. The other meaning of ‘necheshalim’(from the word nachush) is bold or brazen, and these might have been people who decided to travel on their own.

8) There is another interpretation of ‘necheshalim’; those who complained against Moshe at Refidim. If this is the case, it would explain why HaShem didn’t protect them, but not why Moshe was so enraged by their murders! Moshe ordered the deaths of those who opposed his regime without much regret, so why would he now be upset that someone else, from the outside no less, came along to do the job for him? Especially if that seemed a Providential punishment for disloyalty? Maybe Moshe enjoyed being the ‘enforcer’.

9) The account in Shemos 17 says nothing about stragglers, the bold and brazen, or the loners. Why weren’t they mentioned there?

There is one issue that I have not elaborated upon, but does require mentioning. There is far more archaeological evidence for Amalekites of that era than there is for the Israelites of that same period. That’s something to think about and seems quite ironic; that the ones commanded to eradicate the memory of others have no evidence of their own existence, yet for those who are to be destroyed, more evidence seems to come forth. Is it possible that the command to destroy Amalek was really because he, being the first to attack us, saw us for what we really were, or were not, and that we had to silence these witnesses to prevent them from exposing our fraud?

I just don’t see any good reason why the Amalekites should be singled out for such virile and eternal hatred, to point of eradication and “Final Solution” simply for choosing to be the first among many nations to defend themselves against a larger and more imposing foe. This question becomes stronger from considering the apparent contradictions in both Torah and Midrashic accounts of the wars with Amalek.

What did Moshe expect them to do, throw a welcome party?

A Dangerous Double Standard

תנא דבי ר' ישמעאל אם ראית תלמיד חכם שעבר עבירה בלילה אל תהרהר אחריו ביום שמא עשה תשובה שמא סלקא דעתך אלא ודאי עשה תשובה והני מילי בדברים שבגופו אבל בממונא עד דמהדר למריה

Berachos 19a

“It was taught in the Beis Medrash of Rabi Yishmoel: If you see a talmid chochom who has committed a sin at night, do not harbor bad thoughts about him during the day; since perhaps he may have already repented. No! Do not say ‘perhaps’. It is absolutely certain that he repented. This, however, only applies to sexual indiscretions, but if he has embezzled money, he may be criticized until he repays it.”

If you have ever wondered why there are so many in the Charedi kehillos who participate in criminal sexual activity or child molestation, and are never called into Beis Din or into civil court, here is the source for it. Some claim it is a matter of chilul hashem, but it really has a deeper source, that being the elitist attitude of the chachomim. All Jews are NOT created equal it seems.

The Gemara refers to a talmid chochom as ‘chaver’. That is the same as the Aramaic term ‘chavrusa’, which means a study partner. Those who follow the rabbonnim are called friends, and what do we call those that don’t? There is a clear double standard, and though some may say that the talmidei chachomim have earned the right to be treated as an elite class, when one witnesses the disdain that these elitists show for the common man, one wonders if they consider us as Jews at all. The term ‘chaver’ is synonymous with the ‘good ole boys’ network, or maybe more like a fraternity, where the pledges and members have special rights and the protection of their ‘chaverim’.

Ok, am I the only guy who sees a problem here? Here is the scenario. I witness the Rov of my kehilla, a married man, coming out of a massage parlor or beis kurve at 3 a.m., or my son tells me that his melamud or camp counselor ‘touched’ him inappropriately. When I run into this skhutz the next morning at shul, I am supposed to act as if nothing is wrong and continue to treat him with the same kavod that I did before? Simply on the assumption that he ‘certainly’ did teshuva between the time he zipped up his pants and unzipped his talis zekkel? Bullshit!

This also means that if there is a known sexual predator among the elite, who does his dirty deeds at ‘night’, meaning b’seyser, that we the people should machen zich nisht visendig. Why? Because, according to the tuchis-lechers who hang out at the Beis Medrash of Rabi Yishmoel, the ‘chaver’ in question would have already, toch k’dei dibur, mestama, done teshuva shleyma for his aveyras! Bullshit!

This sounds a lot like modern Jesusism, where the holy roller preachers like Jimmy Swaggart, Robert Tilton, at least 30 Popes, a host of others get a pass when it comes to their sexual indiscretions and affairs, because they have ‘opened their hearts to Jesus’. It’s just that easy for them, too. Maybe those notzrim are also talmidei chachomim? Just another class of religious elitists who think they have a monopoly on emunah and da’as. They believe themselves above the law that they write for everyone else. Bullshit!

I though that teshuva was a drawn out process of introspection and personal assessment, meant not only to change the behavior, but to change the entire thinking pattern of the person, thus bringing them closer to the ideal mindset and character traits necessary for real deveikus. Maybe that whole cognitive and behavioral recovery program is just for those of us who aren’t members of the Fraternal Order of Chaverim.

It is a twisted and sick world that will tolerate child molestors and other sex offenders in its midst, while those who harbor doubts and even mild heresy are socially and sometimes halachically excommunicated from their communities. Talk to those people about teshuva and being re-accepted wholeheartedly by the kehillos, and you will find there is still no tolerance for keeping an open mind, but plenty for having an open zipper.

If you ever find yourself wondering why this is, remember Berachos 19a. As H. L. Mencken (1880 - 1956) said, “A judge is a law student who marks his own examination papers.” One should not be surprised that these “shoftim” give themselves a pass on their sexual indiscretions.

March 23, 2005

Terri Schiavo

As many of you know, I am a vocal advocate for Right To Death and assisted suicide. I see no reason to prolong the inevitable if the interim is to be spent in a limited mental or severely diminished physical capacity. I want to be resuscitated the first time or maybe second time only, should the emergency arise. I used think that I wouldn’t want that at all, but considering the latest advances in emergency medicine, surgery, and recovery care, the chances of making a good recovery are much greater than in days past. I would hate to think that I’d give up the chance of living again, even for a short time, based upon an outdated sense of reality. One has to keep up with the science to make an informed decision.

I haven’t prepared my Living Will as of yet, but I will soon. Whether one is adamant about remaining alive at all costs or anxious to see what’s on the ‘other side’, having the matter spelled out in black and white cannot hurt at all. Remove all doubt and make your transition as smooth as possible for your loved ones. I had thought about having the words “Do Not Resuscitate” tattooed across my chest, but then found out that, ironically, it is something that has to be put down on paper, and would not be honored by paramedics or trauma nurses in the event of an emergency. But who carries around a living will with them anyhow? If it is tattooed, then I have no worry about losing it, and it will be evident upon treatment exactly what my desires are. I think the issue is about billing, since the ambulance and hospital won’t make as much money following your wishes in this case as they would following their standard procedure. There is little doubt that accountants and lawyers, worried about legal liability and the bottom line, are making more decisions regarding your health care than are doctors and other practitioners of the healing arts.

The Terri Schiavo case is a heart-wrenching one. Terri has been her condition for over 15 years, with little change. If anything, her condition has worsened over time, with more and more of her physical brain dying all the time. She has no cognitive function left and never will retrieve that. I would not want wish to be kept alive knowing ahead of time that my condition would be that bad, but how do we know that she would have wanted the same? Without a living will or some other legally binding declaration i.e. suicide note or video taped confession, how can we be sure? Or at least reasonably sure?

At first I was very critical and super-skeptical of the parent’s determined efforts to keep their daughter alive at all costs. That feeling lasted about 30 seconds. I am sure that the Schindlers are people of great love and faith, perhaps in miracles, perhaps in alternative medicine, and perhaps in the impossible. They loved Terri and want nothing more than to have their daughter back in any way they can have her, even if it means that she remains forever exactly as she is. I cannot say that I wouldn’t feel the same were it my child. My sympathies go out to the Schindlers. I may not agree with what they have caused by this, from either a legal or political standpoint, but one cannot deny their pain and their devotion to a daughter they love. It is a tragedy from all sides.

Those who wish to keep Terri alive have found a villain to blame for everything that thwarts their efforts. Terri’s husband Michael is being made out to look like a Scott Peterson of sorts, now being in a common-law marriage and having children in that relationship, even though his wife was still alive, and in the minds of some, still alive enough to smile, stare, and possibly know her surroundings. Even though ALL the doctors who know Terri’s condition agree that it is beyond recovery and that she has absolutely no cognitive function, we will ignore that fact for just a moment. The real question is “Should Michael have martyred himself at the bedside of his wife?” Or “Don’t you think that Michael and Terri discussed what to do in the event of such an occurrence?” I’ve heard complaints about money and insurance. Could be true, but that question still stands. Should Michael have sacrificed his own life because of his wife’s disaster?

I’ve had a few long-term relationships in the last 15 years, and with the exception of my marriage, where the subject was taboo, in each and every instance, when the subject of euthanasia or DNR (do not resuscitate) comes up in conversation, I state my desires clearly. They may have changed somewhat from my original views, but as they change I let everyone know about those changes so that nobody ever has to guess as to what I want and when I want it. My partners, too, have shared their last wishes with me as well. Similarly, I believe that Michael and Terri did discuss this, since it is something that has been a popular issue for the last two decades, and is important for spouses and relatives to be aware of in the case of sudden illness or accident. Many couples put a plan of action in place for such an event, even if not on paper or with an attorney present. That Michael would know his wife’s feeling on the matter and be able to speak for her is well within the realm of reasonable, if not probable.

If you love someone you don’t wish to see him or her suffer. If I were married, and suffered such a horrible fate as Terri has, even if I still had some cognitive function still available, I would NEVER expect my wife to ‘immolate’ herself on the pyre of my suffering. That kind of senseless devotion is akin to slavery, still practiced in some cultures where women are considered the property of their husbands even after death, or as in our culture, when marital vows and expectations of ‘forever’ drive couples into unrealistic images of their relationships. If I loved my spouse, I would not want her to remain lonely on my account. If we love someone, we want him or her to be happy, and we certainly do not wish to be at cause for his or her suffering through our own situation. It is reasonable that Michael and Terri would have discussed this matter, too.

It is also not surprising that Terri would NOT have discussed it with her parents. Parents are not the people who you talk to when you are thinking about writing a will, committing suicide, or preparing for the inevitable, even if the subject is purely financial. Parents cannot imagine the death of their own child, and cannot stomach that kind of talk. They hope to be long gone and well into whatever the afterlife holds for them when it comes time for their offspring to confront these issues. One does not normally share the same ideas with parents that one would with friends and spouses. So, once again, it is reasonable to assume that Terri did not ever mention her wishes to die to her parents, and they, therefore, would have no idea what she really wanted.

I believe the Florida courts made the right decision. I can’t say that I’m not enjoying seeing the Republicants ‘eating crow’ on this one. The political fallout of this event, however, is insignificant compared to the emotional turmoil felt by all who love and care about Terri Schiavo. Even if Terri, herself, has no idea what’s going on.

My condolences and best wishes go out to her husband, her parents, and her friends. May we never be left, as patients or mourners, in question, in doubt, or in suffering.

March 20, 2005

Speeding Ticket Tales: The Meandering Jew

Story #1

During one of my many cross-nation wanderings, I had a couple experiences that I never wish to repeat, even though their outcomes were relatively pleasant, all things being considered. On this particular occasion, rather than taking the bus, which remains my preferred mode of transportation, I thought that driving would be better since I had plans to see a great deal and didn’t have the usual three weeks of vacation time available to see everything or everyone that I wanted to visit. Therefore, I gassed up the car, left my cat with a neighbor, and hit the open road bound for destinations unknown.

At the time, I was driving a beat up 1979 Cutlass station wagon with a 305 V-8 engine, a fresh oil change, and 2 missing hubcaps. This was the kind of car that couldn’t look pretty no matter how much you washed it, with its faux wood-grain side panels and the telltale rusting that immediately gives one away as a Northerner. Yet in spite of its rugged good looks (ahem), the car was really dependable and mechanically sound. This heap of shit could go from zero to 90 mph in under a minute, and at very high rates of speed, the ride felt no different than if one was idling through a crowded school zone on a weekday afternoon. In a car that heavy, one just doesn’t feel the road. This first story takes place, however, somewhere well above that 90 mph mark along a flat stretch of highway in the Arizona desert.

Leaving Nevada by way of Hwy 95 south to Hwy 93 south, one crosses right over the Hoover Dam, or damned close to it, on your way into Arizona. This leg of the trip is replete with panoramic visions that include long stretches of sandy desert, tar-black highway, and blue horizons. If images of lush greenery are what you’re after, take the northern route home. There isn’t much vegetation around there or anything else for that matter, unless you consider other travelers or tractor-trailers as sights to see. I don’t know exactly what amenities are available today, but 13 years ago, there still wasn’t much of that either, and refilling the car with fuel at every opportunity was still a good idea, especially if you drove a gas-guzzler like the Olds Cutlass.

It is important to point out that driving long stretches at a time has a hypnotic effect. One loses track of time, space, and the speedometer after spending a few hours on the open highway. One gets lulled into a sense of comfort or meditative detachment from road signs, speed limits, and things found along the shoulder of the road. The only people I encountered driving under the speed limit or even anywhere near it, were old Native Americans in battered old, vintage pick-up trucks that couldn’t go any faster that 45 or 50 mph anyhow without incurring serious motor or body damage. Now, I am normally a very conscientious and defensive driver. I am not wealthy enough to afford speeding tickets, accidents, and the higher insurance premiums that follow. So for me to be caught traveling at unusually high rates of speed would mean that I was under some kind of voodoo spell or somnambulistic trance. That aforementioned hypnotic effect found a willing victim that day on a lonely stretch of Arizona highway.

I really had know no idea how fast I was going at the time. I only remember coming up on a steep incline, arriving at the top, riding the ‘roller coaster’ down as hard as I could, and then and only then spotting an Arizona state trooper, in a supped-up Mustang 5.0, waiting for me right over the next ridge. I knew right then that I was busted, and without hesitation, pulled over even before he turned on his flashers. I must say that police car was quite a sight, equipped with all the latest gadgets and though it was a dark midnight blue in color, the glare of the semi-fluorescent finish was blinding if the sun hit it at just the right angle. One also never fails to notice the shotgun anchored to the middle of the dashboard either. Maybe they do that more for effect than convenience. Maybe the convenience itself elicits the effect.

As far as being pulled over in a strange place while driving a beat up car with out-of-state plates and traveling at an incredibly high rate of speed, things could have gone much worse for me. I have heard some horror stories about traffic stops gone wrong, and I did not want to survive or be killed trying to live through something like those. As it turned out, I had nothing to fear. The officer was very professional and friendly. I think the patrolman was in his late 20s, with a police regulation brush cut, carefully trimmed moustache, and wore stereotypical highway cop sunglasses tinted so dark that even Ray Charles might be afraid to wear them. As he stepped out from his Mustang and walked toward my car, he asked me to have my license and registration available, and then to step out from the vehicle onto the shoulder of the road. Each request prefaced with a “Sir, if you don’t mind” or a “Please” and as I complied with the officer’s orders, he would always thank me for cooperating peacefully. I never got that kind of courtesy from my own family!

It was a hot day. Those are the norm in Arizona, it seems. Just a few minutes in the sun lets you know who is the real boss in the desert, and it is not humanity. Standing out exposed to the Arizona sun has never proven to be an effective means of cooling off, so once the officer ascertained that I was not drunk, nor a physical threat, and had no outstanding warrants, he asked me to sit with him inside the air-conditioned patrol car while he wrote up the ticket. That was very generous of him. I was still very nervous in spite of his professional demeanor and as I am wont to do when highly agitated, I begin telling jokes. I do not remember which jokes I told, but the officer did seem to enjoy the comedy, and remarked that of all the traffic stops he’s ever made, no one had ever used jokes as a defense mechanism before.

I explained to the officer about the hypnotic effect, that I had been driving for several hours and lost track of the speed, and he understood how that worked, being long hours on the road himself day in and day out. He told me that I had been clocked, according his radar, going 123 mph! My speedometer only goes to 115, and I was amazed my old car would travel that fast and not fall apart! Anyway, since I was such a good sport and joke teller, he would write a ticket for going 20 over the limit rather than the 60 over that I was going. The difference was about $100.00 in fines and a possible charge of reckless driving. He offered me a few good tips on where to eat and what to see, and we made some small chit chat about my destination. I thanked him, signed the ticket, placed it in my pocket, and continued through Arizona and most of New Mexico at the designated speed limit. That was, however, until I came to the realization that highway travel always seems to win over even the most cautious of drivers, and my earlier experience in Arizona had taught me nothing in the way of slowing down and avoiding the eyes of law enforcement.

Story #2

Route 40 across the southern USA takes you through New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, and Tennessee, eventually dumping you somewhere in North Carolina. The Texas-Oklahoma leg of this trip is boring, unless your idea of excitement consists of ‘all you can eat’ steakhouses, oil derricks, the smell of fresh manure, and titty bars. So in a short time, my recent run in with the Arizona highway patrol became completely overshadowed by the tediousness of the Texas landscape, and my psyche once again kicked into that hyper-trance that catches you asleep at the helm and traveling way over the posted speed limits.

Listening to the radio doesn’t help break up the dullness of a long highway. Before the days of 24-disc CD changers and satellite radio, the only other sounds you could get from your car while traveling across the USA were Christian evangelists damning you to Hell, bad country music, static, or a mechanical problem 200 miles from anyone who can fix it. Unless you have a car full of kids to play the ‘license plate game’, or a pretty woman to keep your attention, the monotony of driving long distance will inevitably entrance you into submission. Gallons of coffee will only increase your awareness of this hard fact, refill a freshly emptied bladder, and have absolutely no dampening effect on your susceptibility to its tranquilizing influence. Resistance is futile.

Now somewhere between Albuquerque NM and Amarillo TX, there is a little burg called Vega. This town is so obscure that, even today, 13 years later; Yahoo Maps does not know where it is. In fact, I am not even sure that I remember exactly where it is, but I do remember how I came to be there. I was speeding again and was invariably trapped in the intricate web that is the Texas Highway Patrol. This patrol officer, however, was very different from the professional and educated gendarme I encountered in Arizona, as was the entire experience of this traffic stop overall.

I pulled over at the first sign of the patrolman, and just like in the previous day’s incident, I retrieved my license and registration and waited for the officer to approach the vehicle. Firstly, his patrol car was not the flashy new Mustang with all the latest crime-fighting gadgets available to modern law enforcement that I beheld not 24 hours earlier. This car was a 1974 Plymouth Newport Sedan with the words “Vega Police” hand scrawled over a sun-blotched and badly retouched paint job. There was a loudspeaker in the car, but when the officer spoke into the microphone all I heard was garbled static. There was a single globe atop the car, and since he never used it, I was seriously doubtful that worked either. I started to get a very bad feeling somewhere between my stomach and my testicles. We have all heard stories about Texas jails and country sheriffs, and I imagined myself at that moment caught up in a remake of ‘Deliverance’ or “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” , thinking that those stories are borne out of a sheriff's revenge upon a society unwilling to provide adequate funding for a better car.

Out from this raggedy patrol car stepped a tall, somber looking, leather-skinned man in his mid-50s that had obviously spent too much time in the sun and smoked way too many Marlboros. He was wearing cowboy boots, two revolvers, dark sunglasses, and a cowboy hat with his tarnished silver badge pinned right smack in the middle of it. He strolled in that well-recognized, bowed-legged cowboy fashion up to my driver side window, and as I tried to hand him my information, he said “Foller me to see the Judge”, turned around and got back in his car without uttering another syllable. If the crazy thoughts I was having prior to this weren’t scaring the shit out of me already, following a sheriff off the highway to see a ‘hangin’ judge, in a town with two cows, a lame horse, and three saloons at the edge of nowhere, certainly brought out the dread in me. Normally, the officer issues the ticket on the roadside, gives you some instructions for safe travel, and then you head back on your way to somewhere. I’d never seen this before. I envisioned Rod Serling (of Twilight Zone fame) standing somewhere at the edge of the road, smoking his trademark cigarette and narrating in his off-beat and cynical manner a story of the inevitable and ironic demise of a lone highway traveler along a blistering piece of hot Texas asphalt.

The drive from the highway to the courthouse took about 10 minutes, and most of that obscured by the dust rising up from the road, kicked up by the sheriff’s car in front of me. Never attempt sightseeing from a dry dirt road on a hot and windy Texas afternoon. There isn’t much worth viewing anyhow. Once we arrived at the courthouse, the sheriff escorted me into a stuffy and humid anteroom, handed me a slip of paper and told me to wait until the Judge called for me. He then went back to wherever the Judge was and most likely informed him or her that yet another Yankee scoundrel had been ensnared while violating the good sense of the common folk, and was awaiting a sentence of forced labor, anal rape, or execution in the next room. As I lingered there in mild panic, I finally understood the meaning of ‘eternity’. My only companion was an old steel desk fan that rattled when it began to oscillate back in the opposite direction, and that sound was what kept me grounded in reality for the moment.

All at once, a woman’s voice boomed out from the back room, hurling curses and miscellaneous explicative at someone or something that I could not see from my vantage point. I did hear other sounds, too; a box being hastily ripped open, and the plastic-like scrape and thud that one gets when wrestling with a problem-ridden Xerox machine. As it turns out, my auditory senses were correct and, in fact, it was the Judge who was doing the yelling and stomping because she couldn’t get a copier to work! Apparently, the town of Vega has just been sold a copier that wasn’t cooperating, and in Vega, the first rule of thumb is that one must cooperate fully. My day was not getting any better. Now the judge is angry, too!

I really don’t know what came over me at that moment, but I stood up, and walked right back into the Judge’s office right into the heat of the technological commotion. The Judge didn’t even notice my entrance. She was positioned with her back to the door, standing in front of the copier, checking the outlet, lifting the cover, repositioning the original, and hammering away at the control panel in obvious frustration with the whole process; all the while cursing the womb that bore the crooked salesperson who convinced the Vega City Council to purchase it. She was an older woman, grey haired and sturdily built, with no air of sophistication or pretense about her. I paused for a moment and then spoke up, saying “Excuse me Ma’am. I have some experience with these things. Is there any way I could help?” She stepped back from the machine, waved me along towards it, and went into the next room, where upon I tapped the paper tray into its proper position and the machine began spitting out the copies she had been so desperately trying to produce for the last hour and a half.

I gathered the copies from the machine, straightened them up, and carried them over to the Judge, who was by now, already seated in the anteroom where I had been confined not five minutes earlier, inhaling an unfiltered cigarette, drumming her thick fingers on the desk, and reading the sheriff’s complaint against me. She didn’t smile, didn’t look up, and didn’t say ‘thank you’. She announced in her authoritarian Judge-voice, “Since you helped me, I’ll help you”, and she tore up the ticket and placed it in the wastebasket. “Have a good day.” I thanked her and left, happy to have escaped from the possibility of serving time in a Texas jail or becoming the victim of a real-life B horror flick nightmare.

Not a talkative bunch those Vega folks. Oh well. I suppose it was better to have said too little than too much.

I did not stop for anything else until the “You Are Now Leaving Texas” road sign was well out of sight. The rest of my trip was remarkably uneventful. Thankfully.

March 19, 2005

Yevgeny Yevtushenko



If you have not yet discovered the amazing work of this Soviet Dissident poet, you have been missing out on a huge chunk of literary greatness. Yevtushenko’s realism and emotion are unmatched, no matter what the subject he encounters.

Among Yevtushenko’s works might be something that some of you will recognize. I reason I chose to post this particular work should be obvious.

Babi Yar

No monument stands over Babi Yar.

A drop sheer as a crude gravestone.

I am afraid.

Today I am as old in years

as all the Jewish people.

Now I seem to be

a Jew.

Here I plod through ancient Egypt.

Here I perish crucified, on the cross,

and to this day I bear the scars of nails.

I seem to be

Dreyfus.

The Philistine

is both informer and judge.

I am behind bars.

Beset on every side.

Hounded,

spat on,

slandered.

Squealing, dainty ladies in flounced Brussels lace

stick their parasols into my face.

I seem to be then

a young boy in Byelostok.

Blood runs, spilling over the floors.

The barroom rabble-rousers

give off a stench of vodka and onion.

A boot kicks me aside, helpless.

In vain I plead with these pogrom bullies.

While they jeer and shout,

"Beat the Yids. Save Russia!"

some grain-marketeer beats up my mother.

0 my Russian people!

I know

you

are international to the core.

But those with unclean hands

have often made a jingle of your purest name.

I know the goodness of my land.

How vile these anti-Semites-

without a qualm

they pompously called themselves

the Union of the Russian People!

I seem to be

Anne Frank

transparent

as a branch in April.

And I love.

And have no need of phrases.

My need

is that we gaze into each other.

How little we can see

or smell!

We are denied the leaves,

we are denied the sky.

Yet we can do so much --

tenderly

embrace each other in a darkened room.

They're coming here?

Be not afraid. Those are the booming

sounds of spring:

spring is coming here.

Come then to me.

Quick, give me your lips.

Are they smashing down the door?

No, it's the ice breaking ...

The wild grasses rustle over Babi Yar.

The trees look ominous,

like judges.

Here all things scream silently,

and, baring my head,

slowly I feel myself

turning gray.

And I myself

am one massive, soundless scream

above the thousand thousand buried here.

I am

each old man

here shot dead.

I am

every child

here shot dead.

Nothing in me

shall ever forget!

The "Internationale," let it

thunder

when the last anti-Semite on earth

is buried forever.

In my blood there is no Jewish blood.

In their callous rage, all anti-Semites

must hate me now as a Jew.

For that reason

I am a true Russian!

March 18, 2005

Crooks With Stock Options



A comedienne once remarked “I’m no longer scared to walk through the ghetto late at night. If I get mugged, they only get what I have with me at the time. But when I get jacked by a corporate crook, he steals my future! Next time I see a white man with a brief case and Wall St. Journal coming towards me, I’m crossing the street!”

It’s high time that corporate crooks get the same treatment as muggers, drug dealers, and carjackers. Instead of having these guys climb out of limousines in front of the courthouse under escort of smiling lawyers and their pretty wives, they should be shackled like common thieves dressed in jailhouse jump suits, and dragged by armed guard from the bowels of some hellish city lock-up. There is no reason to treat them any differently than other villians who commit Class A felonies or engage in conspiracy to defraud the public or the government.

The government is also to blame here for not doing its job. One only has to follow the prosecutions and investigations conducted by the NY AG Eliot Spitzer to know just how well the regulatory commissions have been handling corporate criminality. The SEC is a huge joke, and is run by a crony of big corporations; a man who routinely ignores flagrant violations of anti-trust and insider deals. On the other hand, Eliot Spitzer, who has a practical understanding of Wall St., is exposing the rampant criminality that goes on with the tacit consent of Federal agencies mandated to oversee their financial practices. Spitzer, who in my estimation is a hero of the common man, cannot get the Federal government to pursue many of the cases he brings forth, because the heads of these departments are presidential appointees, chosen for their ability to 'turn the other cheek' when someone else is being slapped.

It is not that Spitzer is now suddenly exposing how big fish eat the little fish. The anti-trust laws are supposed to prevent that from happening. Spitzer's revelation is that these companies are nibbling extra little bites from everyone and everything, and once you connect the financial 'dots' of their scheme, you find that billions of investor, shareholder, and premium dollars are being diverted from honest companies and hard-working investors. A little extra bite here and another over there will add up. Spitzer has prosecuted fraud and price fixing in the insurance industry, bloated fees on mutual fund transactions, and, thankfully, has brought these companies to settlements where the consumer, rather than the state, is compensated for the losses. As he puts it, “It is not the state that has been robbed, but the people. The monies should go back to them.” Spitzer understands, as do all good Progressives, what is good for the people is good for the state. Companies are anxious to clean up their practices and go 'straight' as soon they get that first phone call from one of Spitzer's associates.

Among the common sense arguments we can offer in favor of better regulatory practices is the simple arithmetic. We hear unbelievable dollar amounts in blurbs on the evening news, but do not realize that these numbers have faces behind them. When Enron practices accounting ‘irregularities’ to boost its venture capital and ultimately collapses, who are those faces? Why aren’t we seeing them? Those faces belong to the hard-working people whose pensions were placed in the hands of Enron for safekeeping and the promise of the company to do all it could to elevate the value of those investments. People’s financial futures were ruined because a man who already made outrageous sums of money wanted to make even more just overnight! The FBI compiles yearly estimates of dollar damages from person on person crime, but no amount of damages have ever been gauged as to just how much corporate criminality really costs the American public. I'm almost afraid to find out.

These schemes also hurt other businesses. The value of a stock is dependent upon ratings issued by the SEC, based on the accounting submitted by the company, and their projections for the next fiscal quarter. The borrowing and bidding power is based on that very important rating. By showing a profit they become instant financial darlings. When WorldCom creatively spun its numbers to show it in the black and thus garnered a larger borrowing ability, other companies, such as AT&T, where honesty still reigns, lost contracts and market share directly as a result of WorldCom criminality. When AT&T loses, so do their employees and shareholders. In the end, WorldCom still received the government contracts it had sought after. This is but another shameful example of corrupt business and corrupt government in collusion. How does a government that claims to abide by the rule of law, enter into agreements with corporations that violate the law? If an individual commits a felony, he can’t even find a job, let alone be offered a $4 billion dollar contract by the same government that prosecuted him!

How many more General Electrics, WorldComs, Enrons, Tycos, and Arthur Andersons do the American people have to see before they get the message? These are the same cadre of gangsters and crooks that GW Bushwacker wants to have administer Social Security! How soon we forget that Social Security was started in reaction to the fickleness and corruption of those very same markets!

On the plus side, recent changes in the IRS enforcement policies now have them targeting some of the wealthy cheats. Bernie Ebbers, who throughout his trial insisted that he knew nothing about the creative accounting practices of his CFO, will hopefully face a long prison term. Kenneth Lay is next, and let’s hope our government makes examples of them as a warning to others who believe their quasi-religious pursuit of greed affords them license to stray beyond the rule of law and common decency.

"There is enough for everyone's need, but not for everyone's greed."

March 17, 2005

Dear Readers

Due to an increase in work hours and the sudden need for a social life, I am left in a bit of a quandry. Do I post less often or, as I think would be best, stop wasting time trying to make the blog ‘artsy’? Nice pictures and quotes are a plus, and I’m sure that some like seeing them, but I have yet to win any awards for these time and effort consuming ‘add-ons’, so I will be dropping them from most of my posts to concentrate on my writing style and content.

If you have any feedback on the content or design of this weblog, please let me know. I’m open to suggestions.

Kol Tuv,

SL

March 10, 2005

A New Friend Comes to Visit


Young Opossum and Cat Food (03-06-05)

It is amazing what a little wet cat food can bring out from the woods. A normally reticent and wary opossum stood his ground long enough for Janice to snap this great photo, being reluctant to surrender his 'catch' to any of the other park denizens that frequent this midnight buffet. It's also one of the few really good pictures taken at night. Even with a good camera like the Sony Mavica, these pictures usually come out very dark and need some touch-up and relighting.

There are two other opossum that are regulars here, too. Willie is a HUGE one, and you can catch him lumbering about in the early morning hours. His body and legs are much lighter in color than most opossum I've seen. Shorty is smaller and looks like he has recently survived a fierce battle with a dog, having scrapes and cuts on his face and back. Shorty prefers the dog food, and that's probably how he encountered a dog. He makes a lot of noise when he eats, and even if the television is on, you can still hear Shorty chomping on his dinner.

Opossum are NOT picky eaters, that's for sure. Chicken bones, cat food, dog food, raw hamburger, and 'who knows what' is rapidly consumed by these furry little garbage disposals. My cats treat these visitors with the same deference or disdain that they do other cats and humans, and I am never worried about trouble. Be careful not to approach wild animals, especially if they are not backing away from you; it could mean trouble. Just let them be to enjoy their meal. (If you see me eating, please do the same.)

I haven't picked a name for this fellow yet. Any suggestions?

Isn't it adorable?

“In all things of nature there is something of the marvelous.” Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC, from Parts of Animals)

March 06, 2005

A Faded Family History


Bedroom (Van Gogh)

“All happy families resemble each other; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” (Tolstoy, from Anna Karenina, 1877)

My zeide, bubbe, father, and two sisters, Golda and Basya came to America in 1922 from a small shtetl somewhere between Stolin and Dovid-Horodok. My zeide worked as a barrel maker back in the old country and began working as a rough carpenter, building new homes in both New York and Detroit, where our families seemed to have split their time. My zeide was a quiet man, and due to incompatibility issues, lived apart from his family for long periods of time. I did not know him well, he died when I was small, but I remember him sitting out on the porch, quietly reading the newspaper, learning mishnayos, and smoking that same pipe every morning, except Shabbos of course. My zeide contracted pneumonia and severe bronchitis as a child, and due to the scarring in his lungs, his breathing became belabored in the hot summer months in New York, and he would leave to work in Detroit, where we had mishpocho available to care for him if he became sicker. There were relatives and friends from Pinsk and Dovid-Horodok already settled in New York and Detroit. My zeide died while convalescing in Tuscon from a severe lung infection, and is buried there. I can imagine my zeide hoping for a hot Gehinnom to save his joints from hurting and there always being a fire handy to light his pipe. I hope they buried it with him.

My bubbe Chanah was never a happy woman. Not back in the shtetl and not here in America. My father was her only consolation in life, and I am told that she doted on her little ‘Yeshiya’ a bit longer than he was comfortable with. I remember my aunt Golda o’h, who my daughter Goldie is named for, telling me how jealous the girls were over the inordinate amount of attention that their baby brother was getting. Basya, the younger of the sisters and the middle child, held that resentment her whole life and I know that her relationship with the rest of the family remained distant and strained for some time. She eventually married an American-born furrier and moved to Scranton, where she mothered several cousins for me, only two of whom I have ever met. I don’t even know if she is still alive. It’s time to pick up a phone maybe.

Bubbe Chana was the stern matriarch who made it seem as if my zeide had married too high above his own lowly status. I know absolutely nothing about her family life before coming to America, except that her father was a merchant and talmid chochom from Pinsk. There was one sister that left Europe and settled in Montreal. I met her once, and I think her daughters were not religious at all. In either case, Bubbe Chana was feared by everyone, and if she spoke, you jumped. She refused to speak English, Hebrew, or Russian, reserving what sparse words she did speak for the Mama Loshen and the harsh critique of the grandson who reminded her too much of her late husband, in habits and demeanor. Looking back, I think my father may have shielded me from her for that reason. Bubbe Chana died in 1973.

Golda, on the other hand was the soft and gentle touch of the entire family, and no one could resist her warmth and loving presence for long. Aunt Golda married late, but she married well, and in spite her being a Russian and he a Hungarian, the marriage seemed happy, even though they unfortunately never had any children. I spent a great deal of my childhood in their home, and along with the cherished memories of my step-mother, the recollections of baking cookies and sneaking the fresh ones past my uncle Mendele still sends warm ripples up my spine. Mendele had a study in the back of his house and, in the evenings, he’d sit in a big tattered armchair that his mother had brought to America from Cluj, and he’d light one of those cigars, and open a sefer. I remember taking an old sidur off the shelf to daven from and the smell of stale tobacco pouring out from inside it.

Aunt Golda was not only a yiras shamayim and a ba’alas chased, but she was educated, too. Her Yiddish was very precise and very ‘Litvak’, unlike my father, who wasn’t much concerned for Dikduk in die Mama Loshen, and spoke however he grew up speaking, Golda thought it a matter of honor to master any language she was required to speak, this being in line with her elegant style and poise. There was a downside, however. At home, my Uncle and Aunt spoke English to each other because early on, when they first met, my Uncle spoke to her in the typical sing-song all-the-words-garbled-together Hingarishe Yiddish, and she began laughing uncontrollably at the sound of it. Uncle Mendel was a promising violinist, but when his mother died, he never played again. I think he was a momma’s boy, and treated my Aunt with the same deference and respect one might give a mother rather than a wife. He showed me the violin once, but refused to either play for me or teach me how to play. Something painful came with that instrument, and I will never know what that was. Uncle Mendel said that he had a sister somewhere in America and another still in Europe, but there must have been little or no contact between them. Uncle Mendel passed on in 1983, and Golda soon thereafter.

There were a lot of secrets in my family and too much shielding the younger generations from hearing bad things about the mishpocho. My mother’s family is much the same way. Is this a good thing? Or am I just nosy? One would think I had a right to know, but then again, I don’t share every gory detail of my life with them either.

I don’t even know why I am thinking of these things right now. Maybe I was thinking about how much I’d like to share these few tidbits of meaningless history with my own children. Who knows? These things are so far back in the past. My family is not one for photographs and heirlooms, and what few I did have are now lost or destroyed by my ex-wife when we divorced. I left some of my father’s seforim to a cousin of mine for safekeeping when I left the derech, and I’m sure those are in good hands. Thinking back, I probably should have rented a place for all those little memories. I look around me and think that I might the be beginning and the end of something, with no past and no future to speak of. It feels weird.